Other Ag News:

Tuesday, August 26, 2025 - 4:45pm

(Washington, D.C., August 26, 2025) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently identified an instance of a traveler-associated human case of New World screwworm (NWS) in the United States. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reaffirmed its robust surveillance and trapping strategy, confirming there have been no detections of NWS in U.S. livestock.

Friday, August 22, 2025 - 9:42am
The hills are alive with the Sound of NSAC

As we do every summer, NSAC coalition members recently gathered for our summer meeting, from August 4-7, in Stowe, Vermont. Located some 25 miles east of Vermont’s largest city, Burlington, and about 40 miles from the US-Canada border, we met at the Trapp Family Lodge (yes, that’s right – owned by the Von Trapp Family, from The Sound of Music!) in Stowe, nestled in the Vermont hills with Mount Mansfield looming in the distance over our meeting place. The location provided a soothing place to hunker down and put our heads together to strategize around our priorities and campaigns. The haze from Canadian fires did not deter some morning walks, nor did it deter our spirit to advance NSAC’s priorities.

A hazy view from the Trapp Family Lodge, Stowe, VT

As the air cleared towards the end of the week, we spent some time gathered around a fire, renewing our spirits as we socialized with one another, talked shop, and discussed where to find the best maple creemees. If you have never been to Vermont, you, too, as many of us did, may be wondering what the heck are creemees. Creemees are soft serve ice cream, pumped through a machine to make it more airy, and they are considered the unofficial taste of summer in Vermont. Try one, should you ever find yourself in the Green Mountain State!

A little bit of Austria, a lot of Vermont Vermont NSAC Members

Every year, NSAC staff collaborate with member organizations to select the site of our summer meeting. This year, NOFA-Vermont made suggestions and recommendations that helped guide the selection. As advocates for a more sustainable food and agricultural system and NSAC member organization, NOFA Vermont understands the local landscape in the Green Mountain State, and they played an important role in planning our 2025 Summer Meeting. 

During our opening session, we were treated to a warm welcome to Vermont from NOFA-Vermont Executive Director Grace Oedel, who shared a brief history of what agriculture has looked like in the state since before European colonization, when the Abenaki people still controlled the land, and contextualized their present work in the state. She explained how the landscape has changed over Vermont’s history, from the push to clear land for sheep enterprises beginning with colonization, with booms and later consolidation in apples, then dairy, and then the maple sector.  At the same time, she also emphasized the boom in diversified farms in the state beginning in the 1960s and 1970s, and how Vermont is still made up of many small, diversified farms. When the state experienced historic flooding several years in a row, these farms – many of which do not have access to crop insurance – were left with significant losses. In addition to the lack of workable crop insurance options for these farms, FEMA disaster aid also does not reach most Vermont farmers. As a result of the increasing risks of these kinds of disasters and their impact on farmers, NOFA-VT has undertaken a grassroots campaign to establish a state-funded Farm Security Fund to create a safety net for Vermont farmers. Grace also spoke to other successful organizing efforts to improve the state’s food system, lifting up the work of the Vermont-based farmworker organization Migrant Justice in establishing the Milk with Dignity Standards Council to improve labor standards in the dairy industry in the state.

Farm Tours

At every summer meeting, we take the opportunity to visit some local farms to learn about local farming practices, economies, challenges, and labor. Visiting local farms during the summer meeting allows us to gain insight about how federal agricultural policies are working on the ground and if there are any adjustments that should be considered in our recommendations and advocacy.

Butternut Mountain 

Located in Morrisville, Butternut Mountain Farm is one of the largest maple processors and distributors in the United States. Although tapping maple sap to make syrup takes place during the winter months, a changing climate is presenting new challenges to maple syrup production. Summer months at a maple syrup-producing farm are spent managing the forest ecosystem in which maple trees thrive so that maple production can continue to take place during the winter months. This family-run operation produces syrup from the maple trees on its land, and also purchases from maple farmers throughout Vermont, Maine, New York, and Canada. 

Maple Syrup Tasting at Butternut Mountain Farm

Visitors were given a tour of the state-of-the-art facility, where they learned about the different grades of maple syrup and their various maple products (maple syrup, maple candy, and maple sugar). This visit included a delicious syrup and candy tasting, as well as a presentation on the family farm’s history and the history of maple syrup in America, which provided great grounding for the context offered by NOFA Vermont during our opening session. Visitors also learned of Butternut Mountain’s ongoing efforts to convert to renewable energy at each stage of their operation to sustain the future of Vermont maple syrup production for decades to come.

Foote Brook

Foote Brook Farm is located in Johnson, Vermont, in the Lamoille River Valley, and is a member of NOFA Vermont’s network. The family-owned farm is organic certified, grows 145 varieties of organic produce, and has implemented a Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA) program since 2014. Foote Brooke Farm also sells perennial grass, otherwise known as sod, which improves chemical and physical soil properties and can be part of a healthy crop rotation system, sequestering more carbon and increasing organic matter in the soil. 

Touring the grounds of Foote Brook Farm

During the visit, third-generation farmers Tony and Joie Lehouillier greeted visitors, provided an overview of the history of their farm, and shared about the challenges they have faced in recent years, particularly the devastating floods that impacted their operations in July 2023 and 2024. The floods caused massive damage to crops, barns, machinery, and essential supplies, including fertilizer and feed. They lost an estimated 75 percent of their crops and faced nearly half a million dollars in damages. The environmental toll was severe as well; topsoil and nutrients were stripped away, and contaminated sediment was left behind in some growing areas. Despite the setbacks, the Lehouilliers refused to give up. Through a combination of emergency grants, community donations, and sheer determination, they have worked to rebuild their soil, replant fields, and reimagine parts of the farm for long-term resilience. Their story is one of perseverance, adaptation, and an unwavering commitment to local food and community. 

The farm stand at Foote Brook Farm Maple Wind Maple Wind Farm

We had the opportunity to visit the small livestock farm and processing operation of Maple Wind Farm in Richmond. Maple Wind raises pastured chicken, turkey, pork, and grass-fed beef, though natural disasters that have flooded part of the valley have forced the farm to shift its operations more to chicken and away from beef. Maple Wind is one of a small number of farms that operate a USDA-inspected processing facility on-site, processing both their own poultry and other producers’ poultry as well, providing a critical food system resource for local producers and eaters alike. The visit to Maple Wind offered a chance to better understand the challenges small poultry processors face in finding workers, accessing federal grants that would allow them to improve the efficiency of their operations, and upgrading their equipment, issues that align closely with NSAC’s advocacy in support of the Strengthening Local Processing Act.

Jericho Settlers Jericho Settlers Farm

On the western slopes of the Green Mountain Range and about 10 miles east of Burlington, lies Jericho, where we visited Jericho Settlers Farm, an intergenerational family farm growing certified organic vegetables for wholesale and institutional markets, and also running a CSA program.

Jericho Settlers Farm

Our host narrated some of the challenges they faced scaling their operations, sourcing schools and restaurants, and maintaining crop insurance when natural disasters, such as flooding from a nearby river, keep occurring. This was a topic that NSAC members and staff on that tour were more than eager to discuss, especially learning about the various creative ways that Jericho Settlers were able to finance the installation of many high tunnels, which have enabled them to expand their production season year-round. 

So Long, Farewell

Back in Stowe, after spending half a day visiting farms and engaging in some insightful conversations on the farms and earlier in the day during our strategy sessions, we were ready to let loose for a little while. NSAC hosted a Happy Hour with food and drinks at Stowe Cider. With a large lawn and picnic tables where we could connect, we compared notes and met new and old Coalition allies and friends based in Vermont who could stop by to build community with us.

A few of our favorite things at Stowe Cider

After several days of learning, strategizing, and connecting, we closed our meeting as we usually do, mapping out next steps for the coming months until we reconvene in Washington, DC, for our winter meeting.  We closed our meeting in Stowe feeling determined to continue fighting for the food and agricultural system we deserve: one that is kinder to our families and communities; that levels the playing field for farmers of small farms, farmers of color, workers, and communities with little access to quality food; that helps keep farmers on the land and resilient to the impacts of climate change; and that has the infrastructure for rural areas to market and access more locally produced food. To that end, we will continue working with Congress to make sure that ALL farmers have a fair chance at succeeding, and not just the ones with the deepest pockets and the most land.

Auf Wiedersehen, Vermont!

The post Creemees, Community, and Coalition: NSAC’s Summer Meeting in Stowe, Vermont appeared first on National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition.

Thursday, August 21, 2025 - 3:35pm

(Washington, D.C., August 21, 2025) – U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins today issued a memorandum announcing a new policy directive prioritizing land use efficiency when evaluating proposals for power generation projects on National Forest System lands.

Thursday, August 21, 2025 - 12:00pm

(Washington, D.C., August 21, 2025) – U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins today announced the latest slate of presidential appointments for key Farm Service Agency (FSA) and Rural Development (RD) State Director roles.

Tuesday, August 19, 2025 - 10:28am

(Lebanon, TN, August 19, 2025) – Yesterday, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins alongside Tennessee Governor Bill Lee, Senator Marsha Blackburn, Senator Bill Hagerty, Representative John Rose, and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Secretary Stephen Vaden, announced USDA will no longer fund taxpayer dollars for solar panels on productive farmland or allow solar panels manufactured by foreign adversaries to be used in USDA projects.

Tuesday, August 19, 2025 - 9:18am

The lunchbox you pack can make a big difference in keeping your child’s meal safe to eat. Whether you’re sending a turkey sandwich or last night’s soup, a well-packed lunchbox helps protect your little ones from foodborne illness.

Pop Quiz! Does your lunchbox pass the test?

Is it insulated?

An insulated lunchbox helps keep perishable items like meat, poultry, and dairy products cold until lunchtime.

Is it large enough to fit two cold sources?

Monday, August 18, 2025 - 6:30pm

(Lebanon, TN, August 18, 2025) – U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins today announced nearly $89 million in Congressionally directed investments for 13 rural development projects in communities across the State of Tennessee. These projects, coordinated by USDA Rural Development (RD), will promote strong partnerships and invest in critical infrastructure as well as educational opportunities for rural Tennesseans.

Friday, August 15, 2025 - 5:14pm

(Austin, TX, August 15, 2025) – U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins today at the Texas State Capitol alongside Governor Greg Abbott and stakeholders from across the country announced the largest initiative yet in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) plan to combat the New World Screwworm (NWS).

Wednesday, August 13, 2025 - 4:19pm
Photo credit: USDA by Lance Cheung

Editor’s Note: This post was written by Nourish Colorado, an NSAC member. This is part three of a five part series. See part one, Budget Reconciliation: An Unwanted Outcome for Coloradans, and part two, Impacts of Budget Reconciliation and Coloradans’ Health.

“Welcome” is an odd word to use to begin this post, given the profoundly and universally negative information we’re here to convey. Thank you for being here with us and reading along! This series elevates the many damaging impacts of the recently passed budget reconciliation bill, referred to as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”. The more we can share accurate information about what is going on, the more effective we will collectively be in changing these policies! Our third blog post in this series focuses on some of the ways this new law hurts farmers and farming communities. (If you haven’t yet, catch up on our first and second posts in the series.)   

At a high-level, this bill: 

  • Will increase subsidies for large commodity growers; 
  • Includes little to no supports for small, diversified, and local agriculture; 
  • Makes drastic cuts to programs like SNAP and SNAP-Ed that connect more households to growers and help keep dollars local; and
  • Ultimately delays the passage of a comprehensive, forward-looking, bipartisan farm bill.  
Farm Bill Catch-Up

Budget reconciliation, as a reminder, barely passed out of the Senate and House, with all Democrats in both chambers voting against it. The bill pays for tax breaks and commodity subsidies by cutting SNAP.  In so doing, it has bypassed, perhaps for years, the opportunity for the government to draft a bipartisan farm bill that reflects the many needs of rural and urban communities across the country. For many decades, the “Farm Bill Coalition” of Democrats and Republicans have worked together to draft and adopt a farm bill every five years or so that supports agriculture big and small, conservation, rural issues, and nutrition assistance. The farm bill, like all major legislative policies, requires 60 votes in the Senate to pass, meaning it must be bipartisan in nature. Legislators have long worked together to make sure many priorities are included so that the government can keep on functioning for the American people. In contrast, the budget reconciliation bill needed only 51% to pass, making it highly partisan with the majority party (Republicans) able to push through legislation without needing bipartisan support.

With the inclusion of so many farm bill provisions in budget reconciliation and the complete abandonment of bipartisan policy-making, this process means we may not see a complete, new farm bill until we have a new Congress. The 2018 Farm Bill has already been extended twice. These kinds of delays in changing or improving government programs hurt ALL sizes and shapes of agriculture and clearly will result in increased food insecurity. In the absence of a new farm bill, and to sustain most farm bill programs in any capacity, Congress must now pass an extension (again!) of the current bill before the end of the year.  

How Cutting Nutrition Assistance Hurts Farm Communities

Much has been written about the economic impact of SNAP – every dollar of SNAP generates between $1.50-$1.80 in economic activity.  This is critical – food dollars benefit farmers, and the more food dollars one has, the more benefits farmers reap. The House Agriculture Committee released an analysis of budget reconciliation that summarizes the impacts that cutting SNAP will have on farm country.They point out how 25 cents on every dollar spent on food (whether SNAP or otherwise) goes to a farmer, and for every dollar cut from a person’s SNAP benefits, food purchases will decrease. Cuts have a compounding effect on SNAP food purchases, leading the House Ag Committee to estimate that this new law will eliminate $30 billion in farm revenue due to SNAP cuts alone.  

To better understand the compounding effects here in Colorado, let’s dive deeper. The loss of food dollars through SNAP alone will decrease farm sales, and in Colorado, SNAP is the foundation of two SNAP incentive programs – Double Up Food Bucks and the USDA pilot program Colorado SNAP Produce Bonus, which has over a 99% redemption rate. Collectively, these produce incentives for SNAP shoppers are available at over 150 locations and over 250 farmers accept payments from one or the other of these incentives. Farmers markets, and retailers that gain critical income from SNAP and SNAP incentives will lose customers from decreases in SNAP participation. Compounding this loss is the elimination of SNAP-Education, which has for over 10 years connected limited-income households with their local food system by supporting programs like Double Up, offering shopping tours at farmers markets, and integrating local and seasonal produce into cooking classes. The farm bill is the only mechanism to not only sustain sufficient SNAP benefits, but also to restore SNAP-Ed and secure the future of high-ROI SNAP incentive programs.  Laurel Smith, owner of Here & Now Farm in Wellington, CO, sums up this damage to farmers such as herself: 

“Like many people, I became a farmer because I wanted to feed people—not just middle- or high-income people, but everyone who wants to eat fresh fruits and vegetables. One way I can make sure this is possible is to accept SNAP payments. And since I run a pilot program called Colorado SNAP Produce Bonus, SNAP shoppers can get up to $60/month in additional produce from my farm for free—a healthy food incentive. But all this is in jeopardy since the passage of the budget reconciliation bill. I am furious that almost 300,000 Coloradans might lose some or all of their SNAP in years ahead. Farmers like me will see that revenue stream shrink and we’ll lose some of our favorite customers. Economists have shown that when someone shops with SNAP, it has a significant impact on our local economies. Why would we take that? These are programs that we dreamed up as a society. We asked our legislators for them, and we designed them into existence. For generations, we made changes to these types of programs through the Farm Bill instead of rushing bad ideas through budget committees. A proper farm bill is where we’ll be able to decide to keep Colorado SNAP Produce Bonus going past 2027. Many farmers I know are unhappy with our representatives who voted this appalling bill through, and we’ll be fighting for ways to rebuild a robust SNAP program for the communities we live in and love.”

A Multitude of Attacks on Farm and Food Systems 

The budget reconciliation bill, referred to by the University of Illinois’ farmdoc policy analysts as the “Reconciliation Farm Bill”, wreaks much more havoc for farmers big and small than simply decreasing revenue through SNAP. Analysts opened farmdoc’s recent blog, The Reconciliation Farm Bill: The Top Five Most Problematic Changes to Farm Policy, thusly: “Were it not for the protective cover of the budget reconciliation process and its fundamental warping of the deliberative process as designed in the Constitution, it is extremely unlikely that these five changes would have become law.”  

In its comprehensive overview of impacts on farms and farm systems, the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) calls attention to the significant expansion of farm subsidy programs, all benefiting large commodity growers and corporations, and paid for by cuts to SNAP. NSAC elevates how the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the increases in subsidies through the nation’s largest loss, in addition to risk coverage payout programs for commodity crops (which do not include fruit and vegetable crops), will cost over $54 billion over the next 10 years. Given that only 27% of farm acres are enrolled in these programs and only 31% of farms are even eligible given their base acreage, these massive subsidies will not benefit most of America’s farmers. In moves that seem determined to widen the divide between large, commodity growers and smaller farmers, the bill does not expand access to crop insurance for most small to mid-sized, multi-crop, or direct marketing farms. 

The bill is a confusing mixed bag for on-farm conservation support as well. The major problem is that conservation programs need to be authorized and strengthened through an actual farm bill. Refer back to NSAC’s What’s Really Inside the Final Budget Reconciliation Bill: A Breakdown of Food and Agriculture Provisions for an extensive review of how the bill does not extend the authorization of the $2 billion Conservation Reserve Program (it needs a farm bill!!) but it does rescind unobligated Inflation Reduction Act funds that were an unprecedented investment from the Biden Administration, including from the Conservation Stewardship Program, Environmental Quality Incentives Program, Agricultural Conservation Easement Program, and Regional Conservation Partnership Program.  The bill also does not increase funding for programs such as the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program and the Organic Research and Extension Initiative. These are just a few examples of the types of programs that rely on a bipartisan farm bill for continuity and impact that will not experience support since the budget reconciliation seemingly picked and chose some agricultural provisions to support, and others to ignore.  

Bottom line, this process bypasses the decades-old Farm Bill Coalition and provides few opportunities for local efforts that support regional food systems and connections between nutrition assistance and farming communities.  Stick with us next week to read more about the unfortunate ways that cuts to SNAP hurt not just SNAP recipients, but impact many food assistance programs, leading to concerns for food security.

The post Cross Post: Impacts of Budget Reconciliation and Colorado Farms: Hurt for Farmers and Farm Communities, and the Need for a New Farm Bill appeared first on National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition.

Tuesday, August 12, 2025 - 2:22pm

(Washington, D.C., August 12, 2025) – U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins signed the World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report. This is prepared monthly by the World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB) and provides market-moving annual forecasts for supply and use of U.S. and world wheat, rice, coarse grains, oilseeds, and cotton.

Pages

Signup for the Ag Newsletter

Get the freshest farm news, events and updates from in and around Cattaraugus County, NY at least once a month! Go signup!

Other ways to stay connected:

Fresh. Local. From the Ground Up.

Cornell Cooperative Extension of Cattaraugus Counties ... putting knowledge to work